Agreement With Nouns Of Amount

There is also a correspondence in sex between pronouns and precursors. Examples can be found in English (although English pronouns mainly follow natural sex and not grammatical sex): nouns with Latin or Greek endings and nouns that look pluralistic but sometimes imply singular references, can create problems of correspondence. Other frequently used nouns, which can accept either a singular verb or a pluralistic verb, depending on whether the emphasis is on a single unit or on individual elements, are the number, the majority and the minority. However, if the sentence begins with “The number of”, the following verb should be singular: “The number of available chairs is 500”, for example, is correct because the subject of the set is the number, not the chairs, and the number is a singular addition. (Of course, “five hundred chairs are available” – avoid starting a sentence with a number – is more direct and concise, but sometimes a more relaxed syntax is desirable.) In Hungarian, verbs are polypersonal, which means that they correspond to more than one of the arguments of the verb: not only with its subject, but also with its (precise) object. There is a distinction between the case where there is a particular object and the case where the object is indeterminate or where there is no object at all. (Adverbians have no influence on the form of the verb.) Examples: Szeretek (I like someone or something unspecified), more (I love him, she, she or she, in particular), szeretlek (I love you); szeret (he loves me, us, you, someone or something indeterminate), szereti (he loves him, him or her specifically). Of course, names or pronouns can specify the exact object. In short, there is a correspondence between a verb and the person and the number of its subject and the specificity of its object (which often relates more or less precisely to the person). Articles, possessives and other determinants also decrease for number and (only in the singular) for sex, with plural determinants being the same for both sexes. This usually leads to three forms: one for masculine singular nouns, the other for feminine singular nouns and the other for plural subjects of both sexes: verbs must correspond to their subjects in person and number and sometimes in sex. Articles and adjectives must correspond to the nouns they change in the case, number and gender. As you can see in the tables, the singularnomensubstifs do not change when used according to the numbers один (one: masculine), одна (un: feminine), одно (un: neuter).

If you use a singular subject of the sentence, the verb you use must also be singular. These should always be consistent. • A question of who or what takes a singular verb. Another characteristic is concordance in participations that have different forms for different sexes: • When the subjects are related by or, nor, etc., the verb corresponds to the close subject. (Proximity rule) [5] Note that some of the above also change (in the singular) when the next word begins with a vowel: the and the become l′, from the duel and werden of the, my becomes my (as if the name were masculine) and it becomes this. In English, this is not such a common feature, although there are some determinants that occur specifically in singular or plural subjects: class and number are indicated with prefixes (or sometimes their absence) that are not always the same for nouns, adjectives and verbs, as the examples show. In Latin, a pronoun like “ego” and “do” is inserted only for contrast and selection. Proper names and common names that function as a subject are nevertheless common. This is the reason why Latin is described as a zero subl langage. Spoken French always distinguishes the plural from the second person and the first person plural in formal language and from the rest of the present in all verbs in the first conjugation (Infinitive in -er) except .

. .